Too old to get lifesaving drugs: Anger at plan to
deny elderly treatment if you've had a 'fair innings'
Patients who have
had a ‘fair innings’ could be denied life-saving drugs under proposed health
reforms.
The plans would
mean experts taking into account whether there is a ‘wider societal benefit’ to
giving a patient crucial medicines.
The NHS rationing
body, Nice, fears the Department of Health proposals could see younger people
deemed a higher priority for drug treatments because they have more years ahead
of them – potentially contributing more to the economy – than the elderly.
Controversial: The
NHS rationing body, Nice, fears the Department of Health proposals could see
younger people deemed a higher priority for drug treatments (file picture)
Doctors, MPs and
campaigners last night condemned the plans as ‘barking mad’.
The move will also
fuel fears that the elderly are receiving a worse deal from the health service
than the young.
Cancer charities
have already warned that ‘cruel restrictions’ mean older patients have been
denied medical treatment, regardless of a proper assessment of their fitness
levels and how likely they could benefit from treatment.
Sir Andrew Dillon,
the head of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, said he was
concerned about the new rules and feared they would lead to older patients
being penalised in a ‘hard-nosed’ and ‘crude’ economic approach.
The reforms, which
are being consulted on, would see new drugs assessed for the first time based
partly on whether they would benefit society as a whole – not just the patient.
For example, a
drug that helped people to live longer in an expensive care home, or on
welfare, might have a ‘negative’ social value not outweighed by the benefit to
the individual, because such patients take more from society than they can put
back.
Sir Andrew said:
‘There are lots of people who adopt the fair-innings approach: “You’ve had 70
years of life – you’ve got to accept society is going to bias its investments
in younger people.” There are people who subscribe to that, but it’s not
something we feel comfortable with.’
He said an initial
assessment by Nice suggested that accounting for ‘wider societal benefit’ would
inevitably tilt funding away from the old because younger patients had more to
gain from treatment and more to give back.
He added: ‘We’re
really concerned that we don’t send out a message that we value life less when
you’re 70 than when you’re 20.’
Ciarán Devane,
chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support, said: ‘The UK has some of the
worst cancer survival rates in Europe and they are especially bad for older
people. Macmillan strongly recommends against any action which could make this
worse. The Nice board is right to reject the Department of Health’s proposal.’
Penny Mordaunt,
Tory MP and co-chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on ageing and
older people, said any new rules on societal benefit would be ‘absolutely
wrong’.
‘Age shouldn’t come into it,’ she said. ‘It’s about you as an individual and what drugs work for you. You cannot decide from someone’s age, their ability to benefit from treatment. It’s about them as an individual.’
‘Age shouldn’t come into it,’ she said. ‘It’s about you as an individual and what drugs work for you. You cannot decide from someone’s age, their ability to benefit from treatment. It’s about them as an individual.’
QUALITY
OF LIFE VERSUS THE COST
Under the current
system, Nice determines the cost of a new treatment by working out how much it
improves and extends a person’s life compared to existing treatments.
It uses a formula
known as ‘quality adjusted life year’ or QALY.
One QALY equals
one year of perfect health, or two years of 50 per cent perfect health or four
years of 25 per cent perfect health.
Generally, if the
cost per QALY is below £20,000, the treatment is deemed cost effective and
approved.
If it falls
between £20,000 and £30,000, Nice needs ‘persuasion’ to give it the go-ahead.
If the cost is
more than £30,000, the drug is not normally approved.
Andrew Percy, a
Tory member of the health select committee, said: ‘I am sure that [restricting
drugs to older people] is not the intention of the rules. If it is, it would be
barking mad. Clearly people who have paid into the NHS should receive the
support they need through their entire lives, including in retirement.’Ros
Altmann, a former adviser to the Treasury on older people, said it was ‘very
frightening’ that such a model was being considered.
‘It is quite
Orwellian that it is being said that if you’re no longer fit for work, you
aren’t owed anything by society,’ she said.
‘It is wrong to
say older people do not contribute to society. They do so much voluntarily for
their local community and for their families through free childcare for
grandchildren. All this saves us billions of pounds.’
Leading prostate
cancer specialist Professor Jonathan Waxman said Nice was an organisation ‘not
fit for purpose’.
He added: ‘Nice has been the main brake on the availability of cancer drugs during the last decade and caused considerable distress and deaths based on an opaque and unscientific evaluation system.
He added: ‘Nice has been the main brake on the availability of cancer drugs during the last decade and caused considerable distress and deaths based on an opaque and unscientific evaluation system.
‘We need
transparency about how these decisions are made.’
A spokesman for
the Department of Health said changing the rules would ensure good value for
money – without penalising the elderly.
He added: ‘That’s
why we have asked Nice to look at the way drugs are assessed so that patients
can get the treatments they need at the best value for the NHS.
‘The allegation that older people will miss out is absolutely not true.’
‘The allegation that older people will miss out is absolutely not true.’
After
reading this I am left feeling sick that any Government could even consider
this, especially when they claim to be squeaky clean and are still fiddling
expenses
There
are many ways of raising money, including making sure that everyone in this country
pays their tax’s, or should we say pays them to the treasury in the UK, something the Tories have refused to do, yet
it would raise billions of pounds.
Like
so many other people I will never ever vote for this shower ever again, when I
look at them carefully they are no better that the mafia.
Last night they showed a selection of medication on Television including Exelon, something I take for dementia with lewy bodies
Last night they showed a selection of medication on Television including Exelon, something I take for dementia with lewy bodies
No comments:
Post a Comment
I always say that we may have this illness, but we are all so different.
This is my own daily problems, but I would gladly share anyone elses, if they send them in,